Вы можете оставить претензию только в случае, если Вы оплатили заявку, средства не получили, а все гарантированные обменником сроки вышли. Если Вы просто недовольны качеством обслуживания, выберите пункт "Нейтральный". С правилами соглашаюсь.
Learn more. Asked 9 years, 7 months ago. Active 1 year, 8 months ago. Viewed 99k times. Why am I getting a segmentation fault with this code? Community Bot 1 1 1 silver badge. You can start debugging the code yourself using gdb — Abhishek Chanda. The first element in a C array x is x[0] — Steve Townsend. Add a comment. Active Oldest Votes. Jerry Coffin Jerry Coffin k 74 74 gold badges silver badges bronze badges.
Chris Tang 7 7 silver badges 14 14 bronze badges. Sign up or log in Sign up using Google. Sign up using Facebook. Sign up using Email and Password. Post as a guest Name. Email Required, but never shown. The fives are 64bit default base image address and that ole 7F is the stack. Upload useful dude. Like all your flags. Disable optimizations if any, but still post disassembly. Orrrrr, lemme debug with temp ssh account.
I ran in to a similar situation trying to use the uphold image when building from scratch in regtest mode. Going to keep messing around with it just wanted to share here in case you guys were using that dockerfile as well.
Unfortunately it is pretty tricky to alter stack size on Linux. The most straightforward solution IMHO is to build custom musl lib with increased stack size and force litecoind to use that custom lib. Hey guys, would you be able to test from my branch? The fix works for litecoind v0. On another system with glibc the compiled litecoind and litecoin-qt ran also without any problems. Skip to content. Star 4k. New issue. Jump to bottom. Copy link. Can you reliably reproduce the issue? If so, please list the steps to reproduce below: Compile the source code on Alpine musl.
Run with litecoind -regtest -printtoconsole -debug. Expected behaviour The wallet loads successfully. Any progress on running Litecoin on Alpine?